Post by amirmukaddas on Mar 12, 2024 8:46:47 GMT
The structure is superficial when the useful pages of your website tend to be all in two levels of depth at most . To understand, you must be able to reach everything from the homepage with a maximum of two clicks. This type of structure requires that there are no subcategories or tag archives, but that the various contents of the website are all crushed into gigantic "big pot" categories called upon to coexist with neighboring pages by force of cirslimestances. In my opinion, this type of structure is much more suitable for websites that publish news that is subject to obsolescence , the kind that no one will care about in two months. Superficial Vs Deep And what does Google like? What is the best setup? Simply the cheapest! When organizing your website's taxonomies you need to think about how to reduce levels of depth regardless of the type of website.
I'm not telling you that you have to give up subcategories and tags , rather try to build them according to criteria that make the contents easily reachable for users (which the engines follow). Objectives to pursue If you have a Denmark Telegram Number Data website that publishes news, you can try doing these two things: mow subcategories and tags Exclude links to older category pages, those that contain obsolete articles. If, however, your blog publishes evergreen content, mow down (almost all) the subcategories and tags anyway and develop contextual links in the sidebar in order to obtain what I call cluster articles , that is, a set of pages that link to each other on the website and which by virtue of this do not need to be archived in any way.
Sometimes custom pages and pillar articles can be valid substitutes for subcategories, remember this. Conclusions The challenge is always to keep the structure as superficial as possible , without giving up on classifying appropriately when needed. Please do not take what I write at face value , because SEO cannot always be talked about in generic terms, but it is often necessary to evaluate the individual case. If you want to know what I think about the structure of your website, contact me using the appropriate page or leave me a comment below. Oh, I try to answer everyone, but don't expect me to always succeed, I'm just a poor gardener.
I'm not telling you that you have to give up subcategories and tags , rather try to build them according to criteria that make the contents easily reachable for users (which the engines follow). Objectives to pursue If you have a Denmark Telegram Number Data website that publishes news, you can try doing these two things: mow subcategories and tags Exclude links to older category pages, those that contain obsolete articles. If, however, your blog publishes evergreen content, mow down (almost all) the subcategories and tags anyway and develop contextual links in the sidebar in order to obtain what I call cluster articles , that is, a set of pages that link to each other on the website and which by virtue of this do not need to be archived in any way.
Sometimes custom pages and pillar articles can be valid substitutes for subcategories, remember this. Conclusions The challenge is always to keep the structure as superficial as possible , without giving up on classifying appropriately when needed. Please do not take what I write at face value , because SEO cannot always be talked about in generic terms, but it is often necessary to evaluate the individual case. If you want to know what I think about the structure of your website, contact me using the appropriate page or leave me a comment below. Oh, I try to answer everyone, but don't expect me to always succeed, I'm just a poor gardener.